new single  ► "I'm Back"
  new single  ► "I'm Back"
Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.
Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.
Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.
In which someone tried to call my new video ableist, which care was put in specifically not to touch mentally ill people but actually the way they are marketed to. Which the video isn’t actually even about. I just happen to actually think of other people as I am making something. Shocker.
But this kind of shit is typical. The people attacking this video are people MRAs/GamerGate, who’s total bullshit #notyourshield campaign is the definition of disingenuous, faked regard for oppressed people.

In which someone tried to call my new video ableist, which care was put in specifically not to touch mentally ill people but actually the way they are marketed to. Which the video isn’t actually even about. I just happen to actually think of other people as I am making something. Shocker.

But this kind of shit is typical. The people attacking this video are people MRAs/GamerGate, who’s total bullshit #notyourshield campaign is the definition of disingenuous, faked regard for oppressed people.

Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.
Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.
Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.

megamonmon asked:

So about what you said about bayonetta, do you believe that if a female character is sexualised or made with heterosexual males in mind that is sexist? I only ask because there is not this clear consensus on this and I am curious what you think

Bayonetta was designed by a woman, who said that for herself it was a power fantasy. However she also sought (or perhaps was required to have; I have trouble believing a game company would be like, “okay! that’s that, a second person doesn’t have to have anything to do with this” and this doesn’t regard gender) male input on what men would find sexy.

The first Bayonetta game kicks serious ass. Bayonetta is also a 3D character with agency, thoughts, motivations, etc. Things that are required. I also know damn well the game passes the Bechdel Test (many games, despite being a lot longer than movies, do not). However the issue is that Bayonetta is used for the male gaze. Period. If you argue this point, you are irrational. In the marketing materials, a character is used to get your attention through sexual exploitation. In the context of marketing materials, a character does not have agency. In the context of gamer playing game, a character does not have agency.

It’s the same thing as author logic vs. world logic. What is more important is author logic, though it’s fun to debate world logic. The author includes things for a reason, and it’s not usually the same reason the character is doing something. If you believe in a god, think of it this way: what you do means something different to you than it would to a god.

If you don’t believe in a god (I do not) then use The Sims. Your Sims have motivations which are different from yours because you are creator and a meta-observer of their world. You are far more aware of the constructs and confines which their behavior is defined by. You can make them do things, which in their eyes are their own choices.

In world logic, Bayonetta is sexual as a means of power, she uses her sexuality to assert herself as superior. She is the one in control, and she doesn’t actually have any sex because that is her choice. Her body is her business and fuck everyone who is staring at her.

In author (in this case designer) logic, Bayonetta is sexual because sexuality is her power fantasy , but the female designer is also not the only author (and it’s partially influenced by society, anyway). There were male contributions, as well, as to what is “sexy” meaning part of the author logic is already male gaze. The designer and her male counterpart (I won’t call him a second designer as it sounds as if he was simply consulted) are still not the only authors. The rest of the company is also authors in any video game. Video game creation requires at least a few people and everyone is somehow responsible for the portrayal of a character - and I would venture to say the designers are probably some of the lesser in this hierarchy.

Other authors more responsible for actual portrayal: animators, writers, marketers, spokespeople, social media agents.

I guarantee there isn’t a 100% consensus between even the designers and writers as to what exactly the sexuality in Bayonetta means. I’d be willing to bet to at least one of the animators, it’s an excuse to be a total pervert, too.

All of these people interpret the character’s looks and actions before you or me ever see her. So we can talk about what Bayonetta’s sexuality means to her - a fictional character - and that’s fine. It’s good she is an empowered woman with control over her sexuality in world, but her world is controlled by us. And by us, I mean eventually us. Before we have control over it, a lot of other people filter it into what they think it means - and what can sell the most.

Do I think that a character made for the male gaze is sexist? Yes. I do. Actually misogynist, sexist is a little inclusive for the problems we are trying to address in gaming/all entertainment. Does a bit too much implying that misandry is something.

Do I feel like that makes her in-world character invalid? No. I think it’s good someone in that company tried to depict a strong woman in control of her world/body/sexuality. I just think that they didn’t get there because they couldn’t resist stepping onto one side of the line rather than the other. I do not think there shouldn’tbe sexual characters. I think with some work, Bayonetta could actually be what people think Bayonetta is. The fact she is perceived as forward thinking (by even myself until re-evaluating it recently) says a lot about the state of gaming.

The last I played Bayonetta was a few years ago, so my memory of it was through nostalgia glasses. Also, I definitely did not function on the level of understanding I do today at that point. What I did was apply the logic of something I said in January this year about Black Cat, a character I do not like, to Bayonetta, a character I do like. One has to be objective. While Bayonetta is not really the subject of slut-shaming, she is NOT a person. She is a representation of what a collective (a company, Platinum Games) thinks people want in a person. While she has MANY positive traits, there is that sexual element that is very clearly being used in a way that is misogynist in nature: women as sex objects.

More Answers / Ask Me Anything:

Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.

Harassment is Bullshit - but there is a problem with your claims against #StopGamerGate2014

I keep seeing people saying “at this point, supporting #StopGamerGate2014 is implicitly supporting harassment” and that is such bullshit. Stop is not a movement, it is the rest of the world telling a movement to shut the fuck up and go away because they are ruining games.

Stop does not have briefs, best practices, guides, and especially not recruitment. Do you know why? Because Stop is NOT A MOVEMENT. It’s not even a COUNTER MOVEMENT. IT’S A TWITTER TREND.

Someone on the tag could literally be someone who has no idea what feminism is, or no idea what GamerGate is. A large portion of people are pissed off some gaming trend is constantly being talked about. A large portion of people are saying “I just want to play games” in the tag. And (not shockingly) a bunch of GGers are using it to thank people for the exposure, too.

But if you separated earth into #GamerGate and “the rest,” #StopGamerGate2014 would be “the rest.” Stop is not people saying “I support x principle, I repeat x phrase, I AM #STOPGAMERGATE2014.” It’s people saying “fucking stop that shit.” Where #GamerGate constantly harped on the idea it is not a movement, Stop is ACTUALLY NOT A MOVEMENT. NOTHING ABOUT IT IS ORGANIZED. NOTHING ABOUT IT IS PLANNED.

A good point to make would be Stop, besides having a shitload more activity than GG, has no Google docs telling everyone what to do (and how to sockpuppet). Shockingly, A TON OF IT IS JUST PEOPLE WHO NOTICED IT ON THEIR FUCKING SIDEBAR AND WANT TO TWEET IN A TREND.

Harassment is still for scum and there is scum in #StopGamerGate2014. But if you think people saying “JESUS CHRIST STOP IT ALREADY” is the same thing as an organized movement with a mission statement (as much as it was both vague and a lie), organized campaigns, and even a consensus on a single philosophy… well, you’re insane. And being asked to stop it already.

Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.
Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.

A quick GG logic question.

If the Gate involving Gamers was such a pro-feminist movement, why is the gaming press even that relevant? Shouldn’t they be lobbying developers for more female leads? More female jobs?

No, the gamerbros' point is “journalistic integrity,” which started with Zoe Quinn allegedly sleeping with a Kotaku editor for good press. I can't tell you if that happened, it might have. It might not have, as well. Even if it did, that is not the kind of crime it was made out to be and her treatment was entirely inappropriate and vile (this is coming from someone who does not even vaguely like her, might I add). This is what set it all off.

They realize they went too far, as well. But even now, it’s still about “journalistic integrity,” but now that means ridding the gaming press and video games of “SJWs” (rather than harassing someone for infidelity, or sticking to the “sex for press = wrong” aesthetic). Boiling it down, it basically means ridding the gaming press of liberal influence, keeping in mind that feminism is a liberal movement. They hold conservative news networks (Breitbart, anti-feminist) and conservative public figures (Adam Baldwin, who retweets #WomenAganstFeminism regularly) up as representatives of their views, which is completely impossible.

image

They call “SJWs” sociopathic and claim they have no empathy. I’m sorry, what? Social justice is lobbying both developers and the gaming press to be more inclusive of women, trans people and POCs. So #GamerGate is fighting WHAT, exactly?

I leave it to you to answer that.

Please disable adblock on my site. I promise the ads aren't super annoying and you will be helping me pay for things I need.